The description of what it is to be a woman changes with the
times like many other things, but some things do stay the same, one of these
being the inaccurate idea that women are defined by beauty and their abilities
in the “womanly arts”. This inaccuracy is applied to both Silence and Caitlyn
Jenner because of ignorance and a patriarchal mindset. In one of the first
scenes where Nature and Nurture are arguing over Silence and what it is she
should identify herself as Nature maintains that Silence should recognize
herself as female because of all the work Nature put into her. Nature says that
she “extracted the beauty of a thousand to create [Silence’s] lovely appearance”
(2511-12). She continues to go on and on about how beautiful Silence would be
as a woman and how even now many females are in love with her because of how
beautiful she is as a man. Silence then goes on to consider the arguments made
by both Nature and Nurture and comes to the conclusion that “a man’s life was
much better than that of a woman” after thinking in detail about “the past
times of a woman’s chamber” (2637-38)(2633). A genuine fear that Silence had
was that if the rules of the land changed and she was able to inherit that she
would not know how to be a woman because she had spent so much time in the
wilderness hunting and fighting rather than in a room learning needle point and
other womanly arts. Silence saw that because of the way she grew up that she
could not possibly be a woman because she “[had] a mouth too hard for kisses,
and arms too rough for embraces” (2646-47). Not very often do the arguments for
and against being a woman go below the surface level of what society tends to believe
being a woman is about. Both Nature and Nurture include in their arguments such
basic and somewhat sexist reasons for why Silence should or should not identify
herself with her biological gender.
You would think that now in 2016 after the many great
strides our society has taken in acceptance and understanding towards the
Transgender and Transsexual community that people would view gender as so much
more than putting on makeup and going shopping or cracking open a cold one and watching
the game. But alas this is not true, when Caitlyn Jenner came out as
transgender and underwent her surgeries people accused her of being “too
feminine, that she defines her womanhood in terms of hair and makeup” (Source
Two). It’s as if the arguments presented by the medievalist created Nature and
Nurture have not left society’s mind when considering gender. Even in her show,
I Am Cait, her close friend Jenny Boylan expresses her concerns that she believes
Caitlyn focuses too much on the superficial aspect of being a woman. And
continuing to further sexist stereotypes but on the opposite side of the
spectrum Jenny Boylan in her blog comes to Caitlyn’s defense by saying that “you
also ought to also note that so far, in her show, we’ve seen her riding a
motocross dirt bike, pumping her own gas, and flying a radio-controlled
helicopter” (Source Two). As honest as her intentions were she still is trying
to associate a feeling of gender with stereotypical acts but this time against
males. It is a difficult discussion and something that requires a lot of
thought to truly figure out what it is and what it means to be female or male
but because of the changing times it really is something we should try and
define so as not to continue an old and misguided perception of gender. Femininity
and what it is to be a woman are so much more than what the “Romance of Silence”
and critics of Caitlyn Jenner make it out to be. No two women are the same so
to try and group them together under a canopy of deeply rooted sexist stereotypes
as an effort to explain the meaning and feelings of being female is quite an
idiotic idea. As Jenny Boylan says in her blog “The world contains Janet Reno
and Dolly Parton; Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga, and newborn baby girls who have
been “women” less than a couple of hours. Surely, if there is room in this
world for all these different ways of being female, there is room enough for
Caitlyn; room enough for you, and room enough for me.” (Source Two).
Source One: Romance of Silence
Source Two: http://www.jenniferboylan.net/2015/08/14/jenny-boylan-on-caitlyn-jenner-the-big-dress-theory/
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI like your connections here. The stereotypes placed on both genders in Silence can defiantly be seen in today's society. The reception of Caitlyn Jenner is an interesting way to bring our ideas of gender and gender roles in question. We can see so much of the stereotypes portrayed in Silence as still being relevant today, especially in things like advertisements and media. I agree that some thinking have not advanced too far passed those expressed in Silence. Both in the cases of Silence and Jenner there are no clear answers of what it is to be female or male.
ReplyDeleteI'm really glad that you brought up the emphasis over time that is placed on the appearance of women. My sister has actually begun to ask people who compliment her on how she looks to not "casually compliment on [her] appearance" because she feels that it limits how people see her to only the physical features she possesses -- not her talents and abilities as the actress, dancer, artist, cook, and all the other things she is (some of which she has worked really hard to become). I definitely feel that you should still be able to tell someone, "hey, your hair looks really nice today" or dress up fancy if it makes you feel nice, but this reminded me of how she mentioned trying to de-emphasize the focus on appearance as a part of femininity.
ReplyDeleteIn light of all the transgender issues coming to the forefront of today's media, I'm glad that you decided to write about such a topic. The idea that gender is performative is definitely not original, as we see with Silence, but it is often glossed over with the terms "boys will be boys" or "girls will be girls". People tend to remove each other's agency over how one should act to be a proper boy or girl, assigning gender normative activities such as playing with certain toys or wearing particular clothing. As someone who doesn't look particularly feminine, it's frustrating when others reject my femininity just because I don't pass as a "typical" woman. Hopefully one day we will reach a point where actions are not connected to any specific gender identity.
ReplyDelete