In class we explored sex change
romances, a reoccurring topic in medieval literature, notably the tale of Silence. The neomedieval books we
studied also bore traits of gender confusion and appropriation, such as the
path of Arya Stark in AGOT. I looked up some information about sex change
romances and came across the article "How to be a Man, Though Female:
Changing Sex in Medieval Romance" by Angela Jane Weisl. [Access it at http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1813&context=mff.]
Weisl explores gender confusion and
transformation in medieval literature, which she finds to be a
"surprisingly popular topic." She states that the literature
"offers a full range of gender potential, suggesting that the gendered
body is permeable and malleable" and that "in more modern parlance,
the romance implies that biology is far from being destiny." In class we
discussed how Arya's journey through the A
Song of Ice and Fire novel series seems to portray a more realistic
struggle of a woman posing as a male as she struggles to embody and master
masculine, rather than feminine, traits. In contrast, Silence seemed to portray
a far more idealized depiction of a woman thriving as a man, for not only was
her gender never questioned, but she was a wondrously successful knight [before
her gender was exposed, at least].
A quote in Weisl's text helped me
to understand why it was far easier for Silence to pose as a man than it was
for Aria. Weisl states: "because knighthood is so explicitly defined in
terms of gender, the women who pass as men in these stories are able to do so
because of their rigid understanding of what nature means." This quote
sheds some light on the nature vs. nurture debate that Silence examined.
Since Silence was raised from a young age to live as a boy—she learned all the
social cues of a man and was raised with the gendering of a male—it made it
much easier for her to assimilate as one. She was exclusively and explicitly
taught to think and act like a man, which gave her a solid grasp of how to be
one. On the other hand, Aria clearly had an innate desire to jettison her
traditional female upbringing, but since she was not allowed to learn the
social customs and training of a boy, she struggled more when forced to live
like one. Therefore, nurture clearly played a role in both females’ abilities
to pose as men.
However, I find that both texts undermine
the importance of nature. A debate over the "cultural and biological
determinations of gender" can be read at http://articles.latimes.com/2004/may/13/local/me-reimer13,
which delves into the sad story of David Reimer. After a botched circumcision
rendered the male infant genitally deformed, his parents chose to raise him as
a girl. Reimer lived for 14 years as a girl, but he “rebelled at [his]
imposed identity from the start,” always knowing that something was wrong.
After discovering what had happened, Reimer chose to live as a male, but the
psychological scars were too devastating for Reimer to overcome. He eventually
took his life at age 38. Therefore this very real case argues against some of
the questions raised in the medieval sex change romances and neomedieval tales
that we examined. Though gender is in part a product of social conditioning, I
think that nature also plays a predominant role in shaping an individual, which
Silence eventually comes to learn at the end of her tale, as she so seamlessly
is able to embrace her biological female nature once women are allowed to
inherit once more.
No comments:
Post a Comment